The theme of how change might be effectively facilitated is an interesting one, and there seem to be at least two very divergent views on this. One being what I'll call the more common view, that change is best facilitated by some kind of active "assault", or effort in the direction of the desired outcome. If you want to feel less anxious, for example, you set about to reason with yourself, and even argue yourself out of the irrational ideas that you harbor that actually create and cause your anxiety. When once you've seen the light of this reason, and have managed to actively and even aggressively replace your misguided thoughts with more realistic ones - one's that accurately reflect a set of circumstances and conditions which would not lend themselves to distressing levels of anxiety - you will, naturally and automatically, so to say, feel less anxious. This strategy does indeed work, for some people, in some situations. I like it, and I use it, when appropriate.
Then there is the much less known or understood method which says that it is possible to take a more "passive", or, more accurately, a more contemplative or reflective approach to the situation, in which one learns, through practice, and through the development of the capacity for a heightened tolerance of distress, to be more accepting of oneself in all of one's moods and qualities, allowing the inevitable process of organic change to take place without too much interference.
There are some keys to the successful implementation of this approach, and they include the aforementioned capacity to tolerate distress, to "sit with" -as in sitting meditation, for example - one's experience, while learning how to let go of judgments about it and about oneself, and to relate with oneself and with one's experience more tolerantly, more forgivingly, more compassionately.
This method or approach makes certain working assumptions, of course, among them being the one that says that desirable change will occur in a context, in an internal environment, of kindness and gentleness with oneself, perhaps more easily, but certainly more gracefully than under aggressive terms. You could say then that this approach gives a higher value to this context/environment than the former one does. I like this too, in that the metaphor is closer to something like organic gardening than to field maneuvers. Let's pay attention to the soil in which we are planning to grow something wholesome and delicious. Let's cultivate it, prepare it with the proper healthy supplements, tend it and it's produce. Like raising healthy children. This will significantly increase the likelihood of a desirable outcome.
This method, it seems to me, is much more in accord with the urgently needed concepts of sustainability and conservation.
